1992, the presiding judge of the District Court of Luebeck, Wolfgang Neskovic, the Federal Constitutional Court Question remains whether the penalty provisions of the Narcotics Act, which goes against the supply of cannabis products, are constitutional. Others were in the order for the term "right of Rush" embossed and raised the question of whether or not the principle of equality, the hazard potential of cannabis products since equal treatment with the legal drugs alcohol and smoking areas.
The Federal Constitutional Court has not endorsed by decision of 03/09/1994 the "right of Rush" and the impunity surrounding the consumption of hashish.
causing confusion, however, the interpretation of the so-called "hashish ruling" by the media.
Basically, that the exclusive use of cannabis products in accordance with § 29 Narcotics Act are not prohibited, but the processes that enable the consumer first, how illicit cultivation, production, trade, transfer and possession of cannabis products. This not only criminalized under the Narcotics Act acting illegally manufacturers and distributors of cannabis products, the consumers have to buy the cannabis products have in principle and in order to consume they can be punished.
0 comments:
Post a Comment